Sunday, January 20, 2013

Rights.... Right?

A great man once said,
 "They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin

    This quote to me speaks as a very iconic american phrase. however reasonable it may be, i can also use the word of a fallen patriot to slander his own very image. I can say simply,

" Well people, you  are sacrificing some essential liberty right now, seeing how we passed this Patriot Act, so… it looks like you deserve neither liberty nor safety… none of that for you now."

    Simply because I can argue a point, is basically all the validation any Legislative body needs to convince themselves of their own validity. Regardless of what the Bill of Rights says, I believe an American only has the rights that the Federal Government feels like enforcing, or ignoring today, based upon however fickle they feel like acting today.
All Rights are more or less only enforced "In General" They fail as such


1st-  Banned Books / Anarchist Cookbook / Banned Religions (Native American Cultures who traditionally used drugs) [I.E. - Only a true reservation born, full blood, Native American has the right to practice his spirituality or religions customs and rituals, where any other person is deemed a criminal, regardless of simply practicing a religious custom. As it is told to me "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;"

- This is blatantly "PROHIBITING THE FREE EXERCISE THEREOF". I cannot consume/cultivate peyote / cannabis / ayahuasaca  / psylocibin mushrooms, or any other traditional natural holistic remedy a medicine man, or shaman may have suggested.

- I am "PROHIBITED FROM FREE EXERCISE OF RELIGION", simply because i do not have the blood and genealogy to support my God given right to seek healing and insight into life through the use of psychoactive plants.

Saying this is like saying. "No, NEGRO, you don't get communion in CHURCH! Christianity was founded by white people, and Jesus was a white man, so of course ONLY the WHITE MAN GETS TO DRINK THE WINE AT COMMUNION."
These are the words i hear when i am told by the law, I cannot consume entheobotanical plants in search of insight or in a search for a higher power, such as a God or powerful spirit being to enlighten me, and expand my horizons.


2nd Amendment- Right to bear arms - Laws threatened by liberal extremists and TRAITORS attempting to defile America and the dignities and rights of her citizens. You have this right, don't be mad that because you choose to deny a right to yourself, that you get shot in the face for your own foolishness…

If you get shot, you brought it upon yourself, the 2nd Amendment allows you to protect yourself. BY NOT CARRYING A GUN, YOU SIMPLY BEGGED THE MAN WITH THE GUN TO SHOOT YOU IN THE FACE. THIS IS NOBODY'S FAULT BUT YOUR OWN. YOU BROUGHT THIS UPON YOURSELF.
Also felons can't legally own guns.

3rd- Quartering- Troops more or less, still not in civilian houses, this would be difficult to break this amendment… This was much more of a problem in the 1770s when this document was written.

4th- Patriot Act- nullifies all need for a warrant, gives the Feds the power of a police state, enforcing laws without any due process, I.E. Guantanamo Bay. This is all the Gestapo would do, make people rat out and go Narco on their friends, so the Nazi's could find any political opposition and kill them.

5th-
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury,

I was actually citizens arrested in May '10 after i crashed my car, lady stole my keys and wallet out of my car, and called the cops on me screaming. I had not yet been indicted, but still was held to answer for such "Infamous crime" as Minor in Posession of Alcohol. Fuck you America.

6th- "he right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury" - No jury is impartial, an plenty of biased Jury have been found. Impartial meaning "not partial or biased : treating or affecting all equally" Every law no doubt is some sort of bias, to effect, or enforce, prejudice and bigotry upon somebody, to enforce the power of the party in power.

-Drinking Laws- I suffer from bigotry at the hands of the "Anti-Saloon League" and "Prohibitionists" have paid $1,000 of dollars in legal fees and associated charges, simply for choosing to drink alcohol socially as my heritage has traditionally been fine with, starting at the age of 16. Never have I harmed anybody, simply been harangued for consuming alcoholic beverages.

- Drug Laws- Cannabis (Weed)- laws simply to hurt paper industry, and oppress minority groups such as Negros and Latinos where marijuana use was common in the 1930's. Amphetamine/Codeine/Morphine are all chemicals out of patent, but as this is the case, no company can sell them for a profit, or enough, anyways. With them still being illegal, this is essentially denying medicine to sick people, not because you don't have it, but simply because you have so much of it, that you cannot make a profit…

By supporting these Prohibitions, you are telling me, under the light and fury of the Almighty GOD, that you are in fact, a quite bigoted man, with certain predispositions, and certainly quite far from impartial. I have done nothing to hurt you, you simply wish to force your own arrogance and ignorance upon me, to berate me for being anything different than a white christian man.

7th- Same, trial by jury, which is not impartial, however promised as it shall be.

8th- No excessive bail, or cruel or unusual punishment… In ancient times, no doubt, Hammurabi maintained order through Mesopotamia with Hammurabi's code. Essentially, an eye for an eye, a foot for a foot. This is not cruel or unusual, nor excessive, because should this man is simply being treated with his same regard to others. Should he poke somebody's eye out, so shall it be, an eye for an eye, the golden rule.

Anything attempting to wrangle, finagle, or con, anything out of a man, that is more valuable monetarily than the crime he committed, to me is the definition of excessive, cruel, and unusual.

Even selling marijuana can hold over years of Jail time, simply for cultivating a plant from the earth. Were this rational, rather than cruel and unusual, no doubt, the marijuana being consumed would deny the same rights to whichever men smoke it,  as the federal government denies to those who simply sell / distribute / or cultivate it.

9th- The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.  This means the "Protection of rights not specifically enumerated in the Constitution."

This to me means, at the time of this Amendment, and the ratification of the U.S. Constitution, and Bill of Rights by the states, that ANY RIGHT GIVEN TO A MAN, IN 1776, IS NO DOUBT STILL THE SAME RIGHT HELD BY MEN TODAY.

No doubt a human right is "A right that is believed to belong justifiably to every person." As rights such as the ability to cultivate cannabis plants, or any other natural crop, was not denied to anybody in 1776, this means, rights such as this shall never be denied. (The numbered rights) " SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED TO DENY OR DISPARAGE OTHERS RETAINED BY THE PEOPLE"

This means "ANY RIGHT" a person had, sine 1776, will always be his right. THIS CANNOT BE DENIED or DISPARAGED.

Disparaged Meaning-  (American heritage Dictionary of English Language)

1. To speak of in a slighting or disrespectful way; belittle.
2. To reduce in esteem or rank.

BOY. Should YOU EVER attempt to DENY or even BELITTLE ME, for the UPHOLDING and PROTECTING of the RIGHTS of MY FOREFATHERS, OR THE FOUNDING FATHERS.

Such actions leave you to be but DEEMED A TRAITOR, A THREAT TO AMERICA, AND HER CONSTITUTION, AND THE RIGHTS OF EVERY AMERICAN.

THE ONLY PUNISHMENT FOR TREASON IS THE NOOSE.

10th- The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

This right is for some reason never enforced. This says, "States Rights" is always the proper call.

This allows ANY STATE to PROHIBIT any FEDERAL LAW, so long as such such a power, law, or jurisdiction, is not EXPLICITLY GIVEN TO THE U.S. Government, in the Constitution, or Bill of Rights.
This also says, ANY POWERS, not given to the U.S. government, is RESERVED for the STATES OR PEOPLE.

This means, any federal law or power, not enacted explicitly by the constitution, in exact, blatant, wording, clearly defining such a power as given to the Federal government, IS TRULY NOT THEIRS.

Any power the Fed attempted to usurp after the 10th amendment, is truly not theirs, for they are third in line for the right to such power. THE 10th AMENDMENT EXPLICITLY STATES THE ORDER OF GIVING POWERS TO THE PEOPLE- STATE- AND FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.

-Any power given EXPLICITLY and LITERALLY to the federal government in the constitution or bill of rights, up to amendment 10.

-Any Power can PROHIBITED to the Federal Government, by the States, so long as it is not written in such verbatim context before the 10th amendment, such power belongs SOLELY to the STATE or PEOPLE.

This means ANY law, power, or jurisdiction held by the federal government, that was assumed or enacted AFTER the proposal of the Bill of Rights, CAN BE DENIED BY ANY STATE. IF NOT THIS, THAN THE PEOPLE HAVE THIS RIGHT.
This RIGHT to DENY any Federal Mandate passed after 1776, is RESERVED SOLEY FOR THE STATES, or THE PEOPLE.
Any POWER NOT USURPED by the Federal Government, IN 1776, belongs   EXPLICITLY to the STATES, and their PEOPLE.

THIS MEANS::: Should one be indicted or harangued by federal law, ANY CITIZEN HAS SUPERIORITY AND IMMUNITY FROM FEDERAL LAWS AND JURISDICTION SHOULD THESE LAWS BEEN PASSED AFTER THE RATIFICATION OF A WRITTEN AND AGREED UPON CONSITUTION AND BILL OF RIGHTS. ANY CITIZEN, HAS ALL EXECUTIVE POWER, EVEN TO PARDON HIMSELF OF ALL WRONGDOING,  GUILT, or DEBT to the Federal Government. SO LONG AS HE DOES SO WITHIN THE BOUNDS OF HIS OWN STATES LEGAL AND JUDICIARY SYSTEM.

any CITIZEN has superiority, absolute jurisdiction, and IMMUNITY, from FEDERAL LAW AND JURISDICTION, should these LAWS, been ENACTED AFTER the RATIFICATION of the written and MUTUALLY AGREED UPON Constitution and Bill of Rights. ANY CITIZEN, has ALL EXECUTIVE POWER, even to PARDON HIMSELF, of all WRONGDOING, GUILT, or DEBT, he supposedly holds in the eyes or judicial papers of the federal government. ANY STATESMAN has this RIGHT, so long as he STAYS WITHIN the BOUNDS, of HIS OWN STATE'S LAWS, respectfully.

You're's isn't it diff'rn't o' me diff'rn'ce
- A Patriot, Citizen, and Shaman,

- Matthew Arne Thaden

No comments:

Post a Comment