Sunday, May 10, 2015

God: The Haunted Puppeteer ; An Explanation of God’s Reasoning to Induce Existence through a Calvinistic Approach


Calvinism may say God controls everything to the T, and people do not choose or impact their actions or fate, only god. Some may ask, “Why would God do this? What is the purpose?”. This, because God as a monotheistic deity, likes to have a perspective on itself, as normally omnipotent omniscience one has only one perspective and that is knowing all. This gives a form to the otherwise pure monotonic omnipotence and omniscience, giving God the ability to get a taste of it’s own workings, to be able to understand them by a perspective other than omniscience, but also to be able to remove the omniscience and understand any other perpesctive of knowing or experiencing it’s own manifest. To do this, were God always to be perfect and have a world with no problems, this would only give one perspective of itself, God choosing to put distance between itself in order to have a more distant vantage, to experience, understand, and actively contemplate the impacts of choosing inaction, rather the alternative of action, when God is only given the choose of action or inaction. As God is bound by no limits and can do anything, the omniscient knowledge of every choice and the fates of all futures until the end of time, this is Gods only way of interpreting these things, if it remains the only party, individual or conscious perspective. This is like being the person who see’s an optical illusion do one thing or appear one way, while there is no alternate party to state that they see the optical illusion appearing in another way.

This is where the consciousness of mankind and sentient life comes in. These serve to provide a vantage and distance God from it’s own omniscience. Without these, it would be lonely and ignorant time, imagine living all by yourself, never having me another person like yourself for your entire life, being the only human you have ever met. This as were God able to duplicate itself, the mutual omniscience between the two entities would cause their definitions of themselves to be synonymous with each other, regardless of being in different places; this along side the absence of any force that would otherwise deem the sentience of God any different in the form of it’s duplicate.

  . While God cannot separate itself from being omniscient and omnipotent, being bound by it’s own form, it can create alternative viewpoints from which to observe, contemplate, and experience it’s rendering and machinations. Without this, it would have no ability to have an opinion of itself, or to understand what it’s actions mean to each individual, and to feel them as each individual feels them. This arising from if God were ever to choose action over inaction, then including disparity and differences between the individuals it creates the appearance of fickleness and favoritism, were one brooding to succeed, when another brooding of God would fail, when these records of wins and losses are finalized, due to the completion of a lifespan, this is proof of God showing kindness and good graces to some broodlings or sentiences, while showing bitterness and inflicting misery, sorrow or strife upon others. God’s omniscience does not forget these things, and with this truth, all things created by it’s will have a soul, the soul synonymous with the continuous burning of an omniscient memory, the consciousness and experience of the brooding born and dead still as vivid as the second it was lived and experienced by the brooding. These pockets of knowledge, and experiences, separated from the general omniscience, as these have occurred in the realm of time, where each of these instances of a sense, a memory, or an experience, a nerve transmission, all of these now have a time, and a distinct occurrence of this is now different from the raw knowledge of all things that are occurring during that second or timespan, this is now not only the knowledge of this concept, but also the knowledge of the occurrence of the existence of this concept. The existence being a separate reality from the knowledge, much as thinking about picking up your younger sibling from soccer practice is different than actually picking up your younger sibling from soccer practice.

The omniscient memories of the experiences of the lives of past broodlings, burn and haunt the deity with it’s actions and decisions regarding the fates that it wove for the brooding. God inherently has perfect vivid memory of all of the unfairness and strife inflicted upon a brooding, and the existence of this consciousness and the disparity it has breathed, to balance this, each other brooding must life a life of strife to match this one that suffered, as the brooding who suffered lives the life to match the disparate opulence of the others, this place some at a mark of proportional suffering, to the one who had suffered first, using the original place of the first to suffer as the marker to lay a proportional amount of suffering, the same distance from the first opulence to the initial sufferer. These too, haunts the deity, as it speaks to itself “Was this brooding not just as right to be the same distance of disparity as it was below, but rather have this disparity place it’s graces above the first of those living in peace, pleasure, or paradise?”  And as this occurs, it eventually becomes impossible to embellish as much perfection into existence as would be proportional, and thus, this cannot occur and has it’s direction inverted. Luckily, this also occurs, when it becomes impossible to inflict as much suffering and agony as would be proportional. This is repeated in an effort to “balance the books” of the broodlings, and see to it that each of the vantages it has created and separated from it’s omniscience enough to allow it to contemplate and regard itself as a separate entity in it’s own ignorance to the rigid destiny lain before it by the omnipotent. Immortal omniscient God, while stricken by it’s own personal conflict of incessant vivid contemplating all of the suffering it has purposefully created and induced without yet offering any brooding any justification or reparation for the disparity of it’s treatment when compared to other broodlings of God. God has no qualms with attempting to usher indefinite sequences of lives unto the vivid omniscient memories that are essentially the souls of broodlings it has created in order see to it that it can justify it’s actions, existence, and manifest.

 God does this, because if God cannot justify it’s own actions, it would have known this before acting and purposefully orchestrating the lives of broodlings to the point where it can no longer justify it’s actions or existence. If God knew action would lead to the inability to justify it’s own existence or grandeur, then God would have chosen inaction from the start of time, when initially choosing action or inaction. This because the omniscience of God understands or appreciates the force of morality as a tool for developing societies and civilization. Without this, God would be unable to contemplate itself from the vantage of someone that knows what God is, or the vantage of someone that has faith in God, believes in God, or has any other opinion of God. This allowing God to understand itself from a limited perspective that cannot be tainted or polluted by it’s own omniscience and the knowledge, decisions, and judgements of it’s own omniscience. Were God to possess it’s omniscience within it’s creations, these creations would be of no purpose when God is seeking perspective on itself, God, perhaps testing its own creations to see if they will induce godliness on their own, with minimal influence of it’s own biddings. This could be an experiment of sorts, perhaps to test if there were other sentiences that exist that could rival it’s own glory, power, greatness, and capability.

No comments:

Post a Comment