Tuesday, June 2, 2015

The Future of Sapiens from the Earth

~~~~~
Because someone wanted rights one time. I’ve not been idle and searched for rights too much, but still. I would say I love non-traditional death, death and dying motifs,  traditional deaths, weaponry, warfare, conquest, technology and civilization, profluence propagation and proliferation of foot soldiers, vehicles, contests, sporting, risks, handicrafts and objects manifest by the hands,  respectable success, and  leisure pursuits. I also enjoy the theoretical intensive GMO research, development, application, study, and possible release of GMO humans and chimera humans, this even extending to any other competitive form of sapience that can be reared through genetic modification. To think about investing in a computer as investing in the ability to have clear calculations worked rapidly, investing in the Gentic Modificaiton of the Human Genome with development towards rearing other forms of intelligent communicating sapeince into other animals is much like investing in the ability to create societies, pools of creativity, physical work pools, skilled labor pools, and otherwise societal roles that these species may never see through natural evolution, as evolution into sapience proved to be rather rare amongst the animals throughout history. ,

The instillation of sapience could be done by giving animals some dactylic qualities of man, even just giving dog the ability to open and close the palm of the paw, the ability to bend the slightly elongated fingers from the center of the paw up to 90 degree~like the first part of the human fingers, the second two parts of the fingers are not there, but the dog can extend it’s emphasized claws, that have very precise claw control and cube around the palm to give it comparable grip to that  of a human. (half the proportion of a human finger) at one joint in the dog’s fingers,  bigger paws, and and allowing the thumb claw to become an opposable thumb, all fidgets having sizable increase in length.

The dog was intelligent, but it does not talk well, so it can also be given vocal chords with their proportions changed to the range of the natural tone of the dog’s bark. The brain size could come from genes of eating cooked food or something, perhaps the dog will enjoy cooked food and be able to cook. The dog would have short hair ideally, as man who plays with fire knows his natty dread will catch on fire, so he knows that the sheep dog’s natty mane would also catch on fire. If you are engulfed in flame making a campfire, I would hate to see you in a forge. This is why the long haired dog may not be as much of a common person, but it could easily be an arctic dog, or even a dog of a northern parts of the northern hemisphere that was disinclined to to industrial work involving fire, hot things, cooking; raw; amish, fire abstinent, hunting eating raw meat and preserving meat while and surviving off of the wild and in the wild like a normal dog; yet inclined enough to be societal in ways such as having a house or exchanging labors or services for money, it would be conscious still like a person and capable of anything a person would, just as all of these dogs, but it would not have a trade in a place like a forge or be a fireman. It could perhaps make a fire if it wet it’s fur very well and slicked it back before igniting the logs or other medium primed with flammable fluid via a match, lighter or what have you. Normally, this could catch the dog on fire, but the dog had wet it’s hands and knows to move away from the fire at all times; it could do this for heat in an extreme case. the  ;


 this fire-prone dog would not be a common dog, but the common dog would be about the size of a person, with similar capabilities, retaining some of the posture of the dog, while gaining some posture of the man. This was a dog man hybrid, however, this would be much like a dog, in that it would run and have much of the same instincts of hunting and killing. This combination could also be given a small bear to provide size to the creature, rather than having the dog-man be dwarfed to the person in size as even a mix between a wolf and a person would be smaller than many people, but this could be a benefit as much as it is a drawback, as these sized dogs would always be able to fit into things designed for humans.

The true benefactor to society is not the tame hardworking and loyal dog person, but the Towering // Ursus Canis Sapiens // species. The bear preserving the size of the human, while retaining the same style of modifications, both bears paws and dogs paws already having the palm and one bone finger. Both of these have claws. The bear is good for the human element due to the omnivorous nature and the fishing capabilities. The legends say humans would chase animals like a dog would when the species was developing, so this many not be too foreign, some humans do have very apt capabilities in running quite fast and for long periods of time as well. This could even have one put in a cheetah to retain sleekness, preserve short-hairedness that could be lost to the dog and bear, preserve the speed element that the dog and human can possess, as opposed to the bear which was more like a semi-truck on the highway as opposed to a sedan of a person or a muscle car of a dog. The cheetah was like a sports car in this scenario, regardless of the speed not being a crucial factor, but still other things such as the long strong but agile limbs  were something that were desired as well,

This (The above), as a dog has little claw utility or action motion other than digging that I can imagine, perhaps scratching prey or cleaning feathers off of prey; this is  not a task that dominates the life of the dog so it plays a minimal role in the external appearance as it can be deemed sufficient quickly enough, but this means that the dog’s arms would move very little in range compared to the dactylic mandibles and appendages of humans (~a dog would have a smaller total joint based angular range of motion throughout the arm and claw as it uses it’s arms and paws less than people; i don’t see a dog swimming butterfly.)

One can also add a lion for size,  to balance the number of cats, and to respect that male lions have beards much like human males, and females do not. This is a key feature to distinguish. They see you and say; we are not so different, you and I.

These genomes are combined like a raspberry, with some parts turned off or on if need be, otherwise the parts would mostly be the same. The combined raspberry genome is still every small, but it matches up and gets the nitty gritty of reproduction done just was well as a raspberry or something with 8 sets of chromasomess, as all of these have two sets of chromosomes. These would need to be interwoven enough so that it does not recognize any of itself as multiple distinct or separate entities. This means the genes that define the brain are woven together and so forth, that even though all parts are still happening, they are all happening interwoven with each other rather than taking time to each complete their own independent genetic blueprint in separate pairings. Even if this was just taking one half of a chromosome and pairing it to a different chromosome half from one of the other creatures, to ensure that it kept all parts of the chromosomes in order to breed, rather than breed off partial segments. That or make each whole chromosome now a sex chromosome. And rather than one sex chromosome, the creature would fill a shell of 50% of the chromosomes of each animal interwoven, these ones were a tried and true group of even ~25% so for 22 this is 5 and one x or y sex hormone transmission spot; the empty 75% of this shell that is twice the one of the normal one, or just the DNA of all of the creatures that has been rein coded into a the rest of these are filled by bank chromosomes, and the animal just get a manimal every time

~Humans are about brown as a mix between this, brown / gold is a good color for this to maybe be

Human 44 +2sex
Brown Bear  74 ??sex
Wolf  78 ??
Lion and Cheetah 38 ~(similar to people)
(Chimp 48)

46 + 74 + 78 + 48 = a group of 246 chromosomes. Some of these may be redundant as the species are all very close. This was the reason I mused about having empty shells of say the number in a half a basket, where it was a 128 (or anything close) chromosome, but these were baskets and were filled partially beforehand, before taking a substantial investment from sex chromosomes, the sex chromosomes being expanded to a plethora of beyond one single sex chromosome that was transmitted via sexual activity and determined the sex of the human; instead, these small 128 baskets were filled with both sex(single) and double chromosomes that were transmitted sexually and whichever sets of chromosomes filled the 128 shell was whatever would happen to be born. The Chimera would birth two 128 genome baskets functioning much in the same way and breeding the same way, just with a limited genetic pool, and this before it would birth one 256 genome basket

The 256 and 128 baskets should just be close, because that is about what it adds up to total, when just taking an average. This would be made by taking the zygote producing cells of a plant or something with around 256 chromosome, and fancy that, who would have guessed; God loves you and made the Argodiaetus butterfly with 268 chromosomes, just enough to casually switch the native DNA that the butterfly replicates with the melded DNA of the Chimera parts.

The Chimera would be like cloning a sheep more or less, once the genome was established, even if one must use a synthetic egg because it would otherwise be so large. (Stretch the general DNA carrying cell size of the body if you can to accommodate a large nucleus with many chromosomes) The baskets that were partially filled before hand were just like a eggs that are fertilized through sexual reproduction, but these are able to accommodate more than one chromosome (more than just one X or one Y chromosome from the man)
This is also the same function for both of the baskets.



This is only 5, so you get to throw in one to pick because odd didn’t seem right, they were at least sets of two. So you’re missing one and this would be a pair with human most likely, as the other pairs are obvious; this can be a gorilla or another large primate, because the majority of primates would be far too small in stature to mingle with the species here,

The male common chimp stands up to 1.2 m (3.9 ft) high and weighs as much as 70 kg (150 lb);

Adult female gray wolves in northern Minnesota weigh between 50 and 85 pounds, and adult males between 70 and 110 pounds. Gray wolves are larger in the northwestern United States, Canada, and Alaska and in Russia where adult males weigh 85 to 115 pounds and occasionally reach 130 pounds.

A chimpanzee is about the size of a wolf, and that would put things at a manageable size and strength, likely the average of the 6 species involved is around the size of a human. The bear would be there to aid in the ability to stand on just the two hind legs that some of the other member may lack, while the chimp may  simply add dactyl emphasis and omnivorousness, tree climbing instinct.

This makes it viable as it would not overly dwarf the creature and it provides key desired features.

The morality behind these creatures is creating a sapient creature that can preserve itself and lives a life with a comparable quality to that of a human,
The sapient-claw hands work for all 4 of these animals with paws; taking only the one finger part of a dog, bear, lion and cheetah, while the fingers of monkey can serve to emphasize the detachment of the fingers from a paw system as well as the length of the fingers, even though one is not attempting to preserve both joints beyond the first one; bears it seems to have a joint-like area that connects the palm bones of the paw into the finger-type bones, so the range of the finger could be preserved to 2 of 3 joints, as there is only one joint in the finger of  a bear, and i presume that this is the same for the cats and wolf. The end 90 or more capacity that is provided by the tips of the fingers (from furthest out joint to tip of finger) was provided by retractable claws that gave the creature complete function just like a humans fingers would, even the capability of typing with the claws, if it’s fingers were not very developed.

If this creature tells you that it can understand animals, and communicate with more natural sounding animal noises as opposed to words, this may be fair; as one cannot know for certain how much is communicated between animals. I am not confident in this being true, so there would be priority on preserving the vocal chords withn the baskets that were filled by this creature. This creature may be quite large, so birthing it’s founding members from a tame bear sounds reasonable enough, as it is smaller than the bear all in all, so this means there is a lower likelihood of it hurting the bear if it is misshapen or otherwise needs to be removed surgically due to failure to seed properly or inability to birth the animal.

These creatures could breed in the wild given that they could not reproduce with any existing member of the wild, while it would be ok for them to reproduce amongst themselves, and possibly with humans.

Even if the manimal was less creative or handed, it would still be capable of doing many things; the tameness of the dog and the civility of the human and the bear, as well as the rather docile and curious nature of the chimp should balance each other out, lessening the carnal hunting instinct of the wild cats to instead become a sapient intelligence that controls its instincts.

Creating another sapience is like having back-up in life. If humans were to struggle for some reason, the sapience that was created by humans could still thrive or do well enough, being unaffected  or less affected by the root of mankind’s problems. These creatures may just have a particular set of skills, and they may be able to find a suitable occupation and be respectable members of society. A bear sapiens may never exist for a plethora of reasons, so doing what one can to see that creatures are at least part of a sapient creature, if not the true root (as some genetics for sapience must be included in the mix, this is as to why it cannot be a pure animal, as one is adding in genetics from other animals, rather than having genetics that evolved inside of the creature over thousands of years.)

No comments:

Post a Comment